Practical engineering notes on thermal interface materials — selection, calculation, failure modes and application specifics. Written for engineers who have to make the interface work, not to sell a material.

All resources

Chip Packaging

TIM1 for Chip Packaging

The hardest layer in the thermal stack: 180 W/m·K through-thickness, below 0.05 °C·cm²/W, 1500 h aging verified, solid with no pump-out.

Read →
Selection Guide

How to Choose a Thermal Pad

Four variables decide every interface: power density, gap, mounting pressure and service life. Worked examples throughout.

Read →
Comparison

Thermal Pad vs Thermal Grease

Why grease wins on day one and loses by year three — with calculated resistance at real bond-line thicknesses.

Read →
Fundamentals

How to Calculate Thermal Resistance

R = L/(k×A), contact resistance terms, a full junction-to-ambient budget, and the five mistakes engineers make.

Read →
Failure Analysis

What Is TIM Pump-Out?

How CTE mismatch and thermal cycling squeeze grease out of the joint — and why sealed assemblies must avoid it.

Read →
Data Center

GPU Server Thermal Management

Why TIM2 is the largest controllable resistance in a liquid-cooled AI rack, with a worked 800 W budget.

Read →
Power Electronics

IGBT & SiC Power Module Interfaces

Power cycling, 150 °C continuous operation, baseplate bow, and how interface resistance maps to cycle life.

Read →
Energy Storage

EV & ESS Battery Cold Plate Interfaces

Gap variation, cell swelling, fast-charge flux and cell-to-cell temperature uniformity.

Read →
Fundamentals

What Does W/m·K Mean?

Through-plane vs in-plane, reference values, and why a big conductivity number can still perform badly.

Read →
Materials

Graphene Thermal Interface Materials

What graphene really contributes to a TIM, and six questions to ask before believing a conductivity claim.

Read →
Trends

AI Cooling Trends 2026

Chip power, the five-stage TIM roadmap and where the bottleneck moves when packages pass 1000 W.

Read →
Selection Guide

AI / GPU Thermal Material Guide

H100, H200, B200, MI300X and Ascend 910B power classes, with three proven cooling architectures.

Read →
Comparison

Graphene vs Copper vs Aluminum

Five dimensions of comparison, and a clear rule for when each material is the right answer.

Read →
Design Guide

IGBT / SiC Thermal Design Guide

Thermal resistance calculation, a worked example and reference stacks for common SiC modules.

Read →

Not sure which one applies to you?

Use this shortcut:

If you are…Start here
Picking a pad for the first timeSelection Guide
Choosing between grease and a padPad vs Grease
Working out whether your design will hold temperatureThermal Resistance Calculation
Debugging a field failure or thermal driftTIM Pump-Out
Cooling AI servers or GPU clustersGPU Server Thermal Management
Designing traction inverters or convertersIGBT & SiC Modules
Building EV or ESS battery packsBattery Cold Plates
New to the units and terminologyW/m·K Explained
Evaluating graphene specificallyGraphene TIM Guide
Prefer to just ask someone? Send your power level, footprint, gap, mounting pressure and target service life to lipo@ngicer.com. We will tell you which thickness and material we would use — and if a standard pad is the right answer, we will say that too.

What we make

180 W/m·K
Graphene thermal pad — through-plane, for interfaces
1,200 W/m·K
Graphene thermal plate — through-plane
<0.05
°C·cm²/W thermal resistance at low mounting pressure
150 °C × 1,500 h
Validated aging stability, drift ≤ 10%