Every thermal pad datasheet quotes resistance at one pressure. Assembly drawings rarely say what pressure the mount actually delivers. Between those two facts sits most of the thermal problems we get asked about: joints that measure beautifully in the lab and run hot in the product, because nobody checked what the screws were doing.

What clamping pressure actually does

A pad does not conduct heat through its surface - it conducts through the real contact area, which at low pressure is a small fraction of the nominal footprint. Pressure does one job: it converts nominal area into real contact area, squeezing out the air gaps left by surface roughness and flatness error. Air is a 0.026 W/m·K material; every unclosed pocket is a thermal open circuit.

This is why measured resistance falls steeply at first and then flattens. The steep part is contact being established. The flat part is the material's own bulk resistance, which no amount of torque will remove.

Where the knee is - measured, not estimated

From our three-thickness dataset (26 × 26 mm samples, 80 °C, 5-50 psi, ten points per thickness), roughly 90% of the total resistance reduction is already banked by 20 psi. Going from 5 to 20 psi delivers about 91% of what 50 psi achieves on the 0.20 mm pad; the remaining 30 psi buys single-digit percentages.

Pressure (psi)R 0.15 mmR 0.20 mmR 0.30 mmNote
50.1680.2550.158Contact barely established
100.0880.1090.079Steep region
200.0540.0580.054Knee - ~90% of gain banked
300.0450.0450.049Diminishing returns
500.0380.0390.042Bulk-dominated floor

Resistance in °C·cm²/W. Practical reading: design for 15-30 psi. Below 10 psi you are still on the cliff; above 35 psi you are mainly pre-loading the hardware, not improving the interface.

What your screws actually deliver

This is the step most drawings skip. Bolt preload converts to pressure through the contact area, and the numbers get large fast:

F = T / (K · d), where T is torque, K the nut factor (about 0.2 for dry steel), d the nominal diameter.

Fastener (dry, K=0.2)TorquePreload FPressure over 20x20 mm
M2.50.35 N·m~700 N~250 psi
M30.50 N·m~830 N~300 psi
M41.20 N·m~1.5 kN~540 psi

In other words: a single lubricated M3 tightened by hand can put more than ten times the pad's optimum pressure into a 20 × 20 mm foot. Three consequences follow, and all three show up in real failures:

  • Over-compression damages the pad and the board. Above roughly 40-50% compression, filled elastomers take permanent set; the pad thins, the joint opens when the load is released, and the interface that was fine at assembly is starved at end of life.
  • Point loading bows the hardware. A screw boss directly over a thin PCB or a ceramic substrate bends it. The pad under the screw is crushed while the rest of the footprint is barely touched - the average pressure on the drawing is a fiction.
  • Torque is a poor proxy. Friction, thread condition and washer stack change preload by a factor of two or more. If pressure matters to the thermal budget, specify it as pressure, not as torque.

How to control it instead

  • Hard stops and shoulder screws. Let a machined step set the compressed thickness rather than the torque. This is the single most effective fix, and it decouples thermal performance from operator technique.
  • Compression limiters. Specify pad thickness so that the worst-case gap plus a defined compression (say 20-30%) lands on the stop.
  • Spring elements. Belleville washers or spring clips flatten the pressure-torque curve; if you must use clips, expect 5-15 psi and choose thickness from the low-pressure end of the curve, not the datasheet headline.
  • Verify once with pressure film. A single pressure-indicating film map at first article tells you more than a page of torque calculations, and it shows the pressure distribution your FEA assumed but never checked.

Low-pressure mounts: the counter-intuitive case

If the mount cannot deliver more than about 10 psi - spring clips, plastic snap-fits, hand-tightened brackets - do not automatically reach for the thinnest pad. In our measurements the 0.20 mm pad had the highest resistance at 5 psi (0.255) while the 0.30 mm pad was lowest (0.158), and the curves cross near 26.5 psi. A thin, stiff pad needs pressure to conform; a thicker one grabs the surface finish early. Thickness selection has to be read off the curve at your pressure, not at the datasheet's.

Pressure is not free - the other side of the ledger

Clamping load also means stress: on solder joints under a die, on a ceramic substrate, on the optical surface of a crystal, on the flatness of a cold plate. Above the knee, additional pressure buys very little thermally while adding mechanical risk. The engineering target is not "as much as possible" - it is enough, uniformly distributed, and repeatable.

Tell us the clamping method, not the torque. Send the mount drawing and the stack-up; we will read the measured curve at your real pressure and recommend a thickness and compression target. Talk to engineering →

Frequently asked questions

How much pressure should a thermal pad have?
Design for 15-30 psi. Measured curves show about 90% of the achievable resistance reduction is already realised by 20 psi; below 10 psi contact is still forming, and above 35-40 psi the interface is bulk-limited while mechanical risk keeps rising.
How do I convert screw torque to clamping pressure?
Preload F = T/(K·d) with K around 0.2 for dry steel, then divide by contact area. An M3 at 0.5 N·m gives roughly 830 N, which over a 20x20 mm footprint is about 300 psi - far above the pad optimum, which is why hard stops matter more than torque control.
What happens if the pressure is too high?
The pad takes permanent compression set, the joint opens when load is released, and thin substrates or ceramic parts can bow or crack. Point loading under a screw boss crushes the pad locally while the rest of the footprint stays barely contacted.
Do thin pads need more pressure than thick ones?
At low pressure they behave worse, not better: at 5 psi the 0.20 mm pad measured 0.255 °C·cm²/W against 0.158 for 0.30 mm. The curves cross near 26.5 psi, above which the thinner pad is equal or better.
How do I measure pressure in an assembly?
Use pressure-indicating film for a first-article map. It shows distribution, not just average, and it is the fastest way to catch point loading that torque calculations never reveal.